On The Issues
Education
More than HALF of Pennsylvania students cannot read at grade level. TWO THIRDS cannot do math at grade level.
The average cost of educating a student in the public schools in Pennsylvania is $23,000. But the average cost of a non-elite private education is only $11,000.
The time has come for the free market to come to the rescue. The time has come to privatize Pennsylvania schools completely.
Use current state funding to provide every student with an $11,000 Educational Savings Account and let parents choose any school for their child.
Since every child gets a private education using existing tax funding, all school PROPERTY TAXES CAN BE ELIMINATED!
In the event that privatization is not pursued, property taxes remain. But there are numerous palliative steps that can be taken to improve education. Details here.
In Depth
Education in Pennsylvania is in terrible shape. Appallingly terrible!
How appallingly terrible? According to the 2024 Pennsylvania System of School Assessment (PSSA), more than HALF of all students are not proficient at grade level in reading, and TWO THIRDS are not proficient in math. But that’s just the average; the worst school district tops out with 4 out of 5 students who can’t read or do math at their grade level. Even the best school districts still have about 1 out of 5 who can’t perform at grade level. And the 2024 Keystone Exam identified 18 schools that did not have a single student testing proficient in either reading OR math. The terrible problems are pervasive—and getting worse: Trends show a statewide 5–10% average decline since 2019.
Worse yet, we are not getting value for our tax dollars. The average cost to educate a student in Pennsylvania exceeds $23,000, but the cost of a non-elite private school is only around $11,000—less than half!
Article 3 Section 14 of the Pennsylvania Constitution says: “The General Assembly shall provide for the maintenance and support of a thorough and efficient system of public education to serve the needs of the Commonwealth.“ But when more than half the kids can’t read at grade level and two-thirds can’t do math, that can hardly be called “thorough.” And when the average cost to educate a kid in a government school is more than twice the cost of a non-elite private school, it’s the antithesis of “efficient.”
Adding insult to injury, there are no required statewide standards for the student’s curriculum. Although the state’s “Master Plan for Basic Education” includes recommendations, it does not create any requirements, does not require anyone to respond to that Master Plan, and does not directly engage in any follow-ups regarding the Plan. While the Board of Education regularly receives reports about the Master Plan, those reports do not address the helpfulness or usefulness of the policy recommendations they’ve made. In other words, the curriculum is being left adrift with no mechanism to ensure it is at all correct, useful, or even being followed.
Clearly and without a doubt, whatever we’re currently doing with education is not working. But what needs to be done to fix things?
- More money? A study by Standard & Poor’s shows that one-third of the best performing schools receive less than the average funding, while the one-third worst receive more than the average funding. So fiddling with funding is not an answer because money is not the problem.
- More administrators? The number of administrators has been skyrocketing, yet scores continue to fall. Since 2000, administrators in Pennsylvania schools have increased 40% while enrollment has dropped 7.7% So having too few administrators is clearly not the problem.
- More regulations? The existing regulations have brought us to the sad state we see today. And far too many mandates are unfunded, leaving local schools to carry the load. Why would anyone want more regulations?
- More special programs? Initiatives such as the Educational Improvement Tax Credit (EITC), Opportunity Scholarship Tax Credit (OSTC), and Lifeline Scholarships only nibble at the edges of the problem, and deal only with funding, not the basic task of educating our kids.
- More politics as usual? Count on it. The overriding motivation and expertise of our politicians is in getting themselves reelected. Why would anyone ever think politicians are experts on education? They’re not, and educating our children is far from their main concern. Meanwhile, education suffers.
The bottom line here is that all of these “solutions” have been tried in the past and have not worked. It’s obvious that a completely new direction must be taken, and taken soon.
The cold, hard fact is that the politicians in Harrisburg have failed miserably when it comes to educating our kids. They obviously can no longer be trusted with the responsibility, so the time has come for them to step aside and let someone more capable take on that critical responsibility. The time has come for the free market to come to the rescue. The time has come to privatize Pennsylvania schools completely and eliminate school property taxes!
Here’s how:
On average, the state and federal governments provide about $11,000 of the $23,000+ currently spent per student, with the remaining $12,000 coming from property taxes. So rather than throwing good tax dollars after bad, that $11,000 can be deposited into an Educational Savings Account (ESA) for each student each year. Parents can then decide how best to use those funds to educate their children. Withdrawals from ESAs could only be used for bona-fide educational expenses, and any unused amount at the end of the school year can either be transferred to any other ESA or rolled over to the next school year. But once a student reaches college graduation age at 25 years old, any remaining balance must either be transferred to any other ESA or withdrawn as taxable income to help launch the student’s chosen career.
Imagine the plethora of benefits! Since the average cost of a non-elite private school is around $11,000, every child is guaranteed access to a private school education. There will no longer be any need for means-tested subsidies, higher subsidies for the disadvantaged or higher cost areas, etc. While EITC and other programs have been a literal lifeline for about 7% of Pennsylvania students stuck in failing schools, the $2,600 average scholarship amount does not come close to the $11,000 cost of education. On the other hand, ESAs would be an even greater lifeline by covering the entire cost of a private education, as well as being available to every single student in the state.
With that $11,000 boon in hand, the number of kids reading and doing math at grade level will surely improve. And since the government is already budgeting that $11,000, no tax increase is necessary. In fact, it goes the other way: Since ESAs will fund a private education entirely, local school taxes will no longer be necessary. They can be abolished outright. That means property taxes will plummet to a small fraction of what they are today. Kids win, parents win, property owners win, renters win, and Pennsylvania’s future is secured. ESAs would replace all of the other failed Harrisburg education initiatives, saving even more money and ending the unending political meddling.
The $11,000 figure is based on current understandings and Pennsylvania Department of Education data. The logical place to start in the first year is the average price of private schools. In subsequent years, the ESA contribution amount will automatically be adjusted to match the median amount that parents actually spent the prior school year.
Of course there will be many questions about the impact of ESAs on the current state of affairs. See the FAQs below.
But the key question remains: Can the political will be mustered to privatize education? Given past legislative history and lobbying efforts by special interests, the answer is likely to be a resounding NO! So the plan is to initiate the use of courts with a lawsuit to address the appallingly terrible education our children are receiving. Virtually all past court challenges have dealt with education funding and NOT the inadequacy of the provided education itself—such as an unenforced curriculum—so a challenge based on the abysmal results of government-directed education is long past due. In the most recent court case, William Penn v. Department of Education (587 MD 2014), all seven remedies ordered by the court are exactly what privatization delivers, including equal protection under the law and providing ALL students with access to a quality education that does not discriminate based on income or property values. And should the new court challenge fail, there are numerous legislative initiatives that can still be pursued.
In summary, educating our children is far too important to be left entirely in the hands of the government, especially considering their abysmal track record. Government-controlled education has proven itself to be the worst thing that’s happened to students since homework! Fortunately, privatizing education and creating Educational Savings Accounts offer the best way out of our appallingly terrible education system. And the best way to achieve those reforms—and apparently the ONLY way—is to vote Libertarian.
Frequently Asked Questions about Privatizing Our Schools
What happens to the existing government schools if every child is attending a private school?
Since responsibility for the government schools is being privatized, existing government school buildings would be sold to reputable institutions and educators, with the new owners taking over all related assets and liabilities. Annual performance testing would assure grade-level performance in the core curriculum. And if those goals cannot be met, ownership of the privatized school would pass to a new owner who can. In addition, different schools could focus on certain areas beyond that core, such as art, business, engineering, tech, religion, and more, thereby broadening the educational opportunities open to students. Best of all, it would be the parents making the education choices, not some politician or bureaucrat.
What happens to the teachers currently employed in educating our kids?
Students would still need educating, so the best teachers would simply transition their employment to the new owners and continue teaching. The worst teachers would need to find new careers. Some might call that “cherry picking,” but it would more-properly be called “a meritocracy for teachers.”
What about transportation?
Currently, the state subsidizes school transportation to the tune of $700 million per year. Rather than creating a “transportation bureaucracy,” those tax dollars can be provided directly to the student instead. Crunching the numbers, over $400 would be added to each student’s ESA annually to cover the cost of transportation. For reference, that amount is more than enough to cover the cost of commuting to school on SEPTA, LANTA, RTA, and BARTA, among others.
What about rural schools?
With the free market driving education, competition will spur new schools, online options, and more. It’s likely there would be new educational opportunities emerging that are unimaginable today. Witness the growing success of homeschooling, charter schools, and apprentice programs. Privatizing the schools would unleash even more successes by getting the politicians and bureaucrats out of the way. With $11,000 burning a hole in the pockets of rural students, educational institutions would scramble to meet that already-funded demand.
What of special needs students?
Currently, classifying a student as special needs results in a payout to the school district of $4,000 to $5,000, even though 80-90% are mild cases not requiring any specific accommodations. As a result, school districts are incentivized to classify students as special needs, thereby inflating the total cost to taxpayers. Only about 3-4% of special needs students are severe cases (“Tier 3” classification) requiring special schooling, and these can be handled by the state, but outside of the school system. For example, the current appropriation for special education is around $1.5 billion and can continue to be used to offset most of the cost of special education. And since property taxes would plummet about 80%, property tax rebate programs (currently about 50% of lottery profits, about $500 million) can be redirected to special education. Those two examples alone would cover most cases, and the few remaining, most severe ones could be handled through the welfare system if needed.
How would a core curriculum be established?
It is fundamentally, crucially important to have a great core curriculum, as well as a way to impartially measure how well schools are teaching it. The politically-appointed “State Board” that now maintains a suggestion-only “Master Plan” would be replaced by a completely independent Pennsylvania Scholastic Standards Board (PSSB) that would establish and maintain the core curriculum as well as standardized testing for it. The PSSB would be composed of 21 members – a mix of unaffiliated education professionals, parents, and business people. PSSA members would be elected by the counties, one member per county at a time on a rotating basis. The members would always be elected in November general elections, not primaries. Details about the PSSB and the base curriculum can be found here.
How would sales of the schools be conducted?
The exact details would be subject to negotiations, but here’s a starting point: The state would put all schools up for sale to educational institutions as soon as possible after the enabling legislation is signed by the Governor. All assets and liabilities of the schools will be assumed by the purchasers except for any bond liabilities which will remain the state’s responsibility to retire in accordance with the terms of their issuance. Eighteen months after enactment, all local school boards would be dissolved and the state would take ownership of any unsold public school assets and liabilities, including the responsibility of servicing and retiring any bonds. Efforts to sell the remaining schools would continue and they would continue to operate, but be managed by the state as competitive business entities until they are sold and settled. Schools so operated by the state would charge tuition equal to the ESA subsidy amount each year. Schools lacking sufficient enrollment for reasonable viability would cease operation. Any schools not under agreement four years after the effective date would be auctioned off to the highest bidder, and any schools still remaining unsold would discontinue operation within one year and the properties would remain on the market until sold. It’s long past time that Pennsylvanians embrace selling existing schools, because in his budget address Governor Shapiro pointed out, “Today, our kindergarten classes are 26 percent smaller than our high school graduating classes.” Reducing the number of schools is inevitable. We should begin that process today.
Are there enough private schools to absorb the influx?
No, of course not. But since sales will not happen all at once, the conversion to the free market will be gradual as each school is privatized. To ease the transition, unsold formerly public schools will continue to be operated by the state as needed until sold. But as with rural schools, the incentive of an $11,000 voucher will encourage existing private schools to quickly assume ownership of the government schools and establish them as branch campuses.
Is privatization politically viable?
I can already hear the cries from defenders of the current failed system. They may argue one point or another about privatization, but the sad state of our schools speaks much more loudly. Given the horrendous results of implementing their ideas, they’ve lost all credibility. How can anyone defend the fact that more than half of our kids are not performing at grade level? They can’t. What would happen to you at your job if you constantly messed up more than half the time? You’d be fired, that’s what. So it’s time to fire Harrisburg and put parents back in charge of education. It’s time to privatize our schools.
What if I like my current public school?
When more than half the students cannot read at grade level, and two thirds cannot do math, it’s difficult to understand what there is to like about any Pennsylvania school. On the other hand, it’s quality teachers that make a school great. Those teachers that make an existing school likeable will continue to teach, but at a private school without the albatross of over-regulation, unfunded mandates, teacher strikes, and other political shenanigans. But best of all, the new system will allow for any group or company to open a private school. So if parents want a very liberal, conservative, or libertarian education, they can create their own school for like-minded families.
What about the mandate in the Pennsylvania Constitution?
When the constitution says, that the state “shall provide for the maintenance and support…” it does not dictate that the state must directly PROVIDE that education, but only to provide FOR that education. ESAs do exactly that. The distinction between “providing for” and “providing” is akin to Captain Kirk and Mr. Sulu on the Starship Enterprise: Captain Kirk (the PSSB) sets the goal and Mr. Sulu (the free market) pushes the buttons to make it happen.